Highlights from the HDR Symposium
September 13, 2009
Stanford's HDR Symposium turned out to be very interesting event. The collective brainpower of a small nation, crammed into a single room - you bet the air was sizzling from ideas and strong opinions.

There was a lot more going on, and I will most certainly get into detail in later posts. HDRI is a pretty wide field, and this HDR Symposioum surely succeeded in bringing the top guns from adjacent fields together. Kudos to Joyce Farrell for flawlessly organizing this remarkable event.
Just one question remains unanswered:
Who owns tonemapping? The camera, the photo software, or the display device?

Here's a quick recap of some selected points of interest:
- Marc Levoy explained how the Camera 2.0 project will enable a community-driven approach to push computational photography forward. Key element is the departure from "black box" firmware, in favor of a fully scriptable open-source platform.
Levoy further recommends Animal Eyesas reference book for everyone building capturing devices.
- Helge Seetzen from Dolby Labs shared some interesting insights on the difficulties of driving Local Dimming hardware. He called color LEDs "little buggers" for being notoriously inconsistent in color. But exploiting their flaws rather than fighting them leads ultimately to an even better display. For example, spectral leakage turns into an advantage when driving 6 instead of 3 primary colors, resulting in a much wider gamut.
- Jack Tumblin lets us rethink what we consider a "great image", and explains how current tonemapping methods might be missing the point. He honored Renaissance artists like Rembrandt as excellent tonemappers, using artistic liberty to cheat the lighting to create more evolving images.
Tumblin recognizes the "evocative HDR Look" for inducing an emotional response, but the result is often achieved by muddling through. In this regard he proposes a tonemapping approach, that looks beyond the pixels on the screen, and rather makes a distinction between surface colors, reflection, and lighting. This would allow more controlled look-finding. For example, you could tweak just the lighting in a photo, without worrying about side effects like "dirty" or "super-glossy".
- James Ferwerda is hitting the same vein by proposing an extension of the La*b* color space with variables describing the glossiness of a material: c* for contrast gloss and d* for distinctness-of-image.
In a perfect execution of the scientific method he did a field study where participants rated the gloss impression of a rendered ball, which resulted in a psychovisual gloss model. Although originally geared towards CG imaging, this model could be interesting when applied to photography in general. Also, Ferwerda dropped a new wording that I find very appropriate: High-Fidelity Imaging. Yay.
There was a lot more going on, and I will most certainly get into detail in later posts. HDRI is a pretty wide field, and this HDR Symposioum surely succeeded in bringing the top guns from adjacent fields together. Kudos to Joyce Farrell for flawlessly organizing this remarkable event.
Just one question remains unanswered:
Who owns tonemapping? The camera, the photo software, or the display device?
View Comments
Stanford's Frankencamera
September 6, 2009
In preparation of the upcoming HDR Symposium here's one of the hottest topics:
I hope this project takes off, because we're all sick of the big camera makers ignoring HDR photograper's needs. How can it be, that the new Canon 7D is still crippled to 3-frame-AEB? Seriously, an open system without API restrictions is our last hope to push things forward.
Read the article on Stanford News, then dive into the project page.
I hope this project takes off, because we're all sick of the big camera makers ignoring HDR photograper's needs. How can it be, that the new Canon 7D is still crippled to 3-frame-AEB? Seriously, an open system without API restrictions is our last hope to push things forward.
Read the article on Stanford News, then dive into the project page.
Picturenaut 3.0 released
September 3, 2009
I'm just reading a book on webdesign, and that told me I should get to the point:
NOTE: Picturenaut is still donationware.
You decide how much it's worth to you. Marc Mehl, the lone programmer, has put a lot of passion into making Picturenaut so awesome. Please show some balls and buy Marc a beer ($5), a movie ticket ($10) or a dinner ($20). It's easy to be grateful.
There's a brand new sIBL-of-the-month, just shot it a month ago on my home vacation. I snuck into the ruins of an old factory, a very Piranesi-esque environment of decay and nature reclaiming the place. Check out the High-Res Panoview here.
Also, the battle for front seats in the Hot-on-Flickr gallery is on again. Wonder if we'll see some Picturenaut submissions this month...
Picturenaut 3 rocks!
Our very own HDR program is up for a major revision:- New interface (that I helped design)
- Local Tonemapper
- RAW support
- Plugin-SDK
- And more
NOTE: Picturenaut is still donationware.
You decide how much it's worth to you. Marc Mehl, the lone programmer, has put a lot of passion into making Picturenaut so awesome. Please show some balls and buy Marc a beer ($5), a movie ticket ($10) or a dinner ($20). It's easy to be grateful.
Other things worth mentioning
There's a brand new sIBL-of-the-month, just shot it a month ago on my home vacation. I snuck into the ruins of an old factory, a very Piranesi-esque environment of decay and nature reclaiming the place. Check out the High-Res Panoview here.
Also, the battle for front seats in the Hot-on-Flickr gallery is on again. Wonder if we'll see some Picturenaut submissions this month...
